Whitesmoke Writing Software - Quality Writing is Essential in the New Job Market

November 25, 2008 | Leave a Comment

Quality Writing is Essential in the New Job Market

“Online publications and services are growing in number and sophistication, spurring the demand for writers and editors with Web or multimedia experience.” - Bureau of Labor Statistics

How you spend your time in the office:
If you want to go forward in the new job market, you need to write, and write well. Statistics show that many employees spend up to 25% of their working hours writing, making it a paramount skill to master for your daily work. Are you prepared?
WhiteSmoke 2009 is a proofreading and editing tool that works with all software applications. It gives you instant grammar checking, spell checking, and style checking, as well as a one– click dictionary–thesaurus.
Get WhiteSmoke 2009 today and get that job
NEW RELEASE! WHITESMOKE 2009! Treat your family and friends to our Christmas Bonus Gifts! 75% DISCOUNT

WhiteSmoke 2009 Review | Grammar Correction | Proofreading and Editing Writing Software

November 2, 2008 | Leave a Comment

WhiteSmoke 2009 is an innovative proofreading and editing tool with a single aim – to help you write better. Whether you simply want to compose well–written emails to family and friends, or you need professional results for business and corporate settings, WhiteSmoke consistently delivers

WhiteSmoke 2009 New Features

New GUI

WhiteSmoke 2009 introduces a new GUI with an improved workflow. Central to the new design is the presentation of WhiteSmoke’s suggestions and corrections. Replacing the pop-up menus of WhiteSmoke 2008, the user now receives corrections and suggestions in-line with the text, just like when a text is edited and proofread manually.”Our beta group is very pleased with this new development, which brings a more organic and ‘real-life’ feel to the writing and editing experience,” notes Liran Brenner, VP R&D at WhiteSmoke. Other changes include the placement of the additional writing tools (English Lessons, Templates, and the Dictionary) above the text area, and more intuitive placement of the “Check” and “Apply” buttons.

Style Checker

WhiteSmoke 2009 introduces a new collection of style checking features. The WhiteSmoke Style Checker includes WhiteSmoke’s patented Text Enrichment, a unique technology that has established WhiteSmoke in a field apart from competitors, as well as a range of new features that address overall writing style. Users will be notified of incomplete sentences, use of slang and IM speak, and informal sentence structures. These additional style checking features make WhiteSmoke 2009 a great leap forward from previous versions of WhiteSmoke, and consolidate the WhiteSmoke mission of creating an “all-in-one” writing tool.

Grammar Checker

WhiteSmoke 2009 introduces new grammar algorithms and updates to existing algorithms. Key new detections include confusions between countable and non-countable nouns (much/many, less/fewer), comparative/superlative mismatches (more nicer, less nicest), and recognition of run-on sentences. Updates to existing grammar algorithms have further improved the precision of WhiteSmoke’s corrections over a wider variety of possible sentence constructions.

whitesmoke 2009 business version review

With the WhiteSmoke 2009 Business Writing Version you can’t go wrong with any document you send out! Our online software corrects any potentially embarrassing grammar, punctuation, and spelling mistakes and takes your text to a new and more professional level with text enrichment suggestions relevant to the business world. The integrated dictionary-thesaurus, idiom database, and optional multi-language translator [Now Free] are complemented by 600 document templates that all-in-all provide you the best English writing package available!

Buy Now Price: $99.95

whitesmoke 2009 Creative version review

Do you feel like you’ve got a burning desire to be a writer but afraid you still need to brush up on some writing basics? The WhiteSmoke online grammar and writing software is the all-in-one solution that caters to all your writing needs! It will correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation mistakes in any short story and essay you write. It will also provide you with text enrichment suggestions to enrich your writing with synonyms and extra adjectives and adverbs. The integrated dictionary-thesaurus, idiom database, 600 document templates, and online English lessons complete our unique all-in-one writing tool made just for you!

Buy Now Price: $99.95

Get a free dictionary + ESL Online Video Tutorial Courses + Business English Video Tutorial Course

whitesmoke 2009 General Writing version review

Writing has never been more accessible than with the groundbreaking WhiteSmoke grammar and writing software. Whether you are a middle school student, about to hand in your first college thesis or already deep in the world of work, our software provides an all-in-one software package that caters to all your writing needs. Starting with grammar, punctuation, and spelling corrections all the way up to text enrichment suggestions of synonyms, adjectives, and adverbs, the WhiteSmoek English text enhancer does it all. Together with a built-in dictionary-thesaurus, idiom database, 600 document templates, and an optional multi-language translator, WhiteSmoke is just the writing tool you need to “Write Better – Right Now!

Buy Now Price: $79.95

whitesmoke 2009 Bio-Writing version review

Completing those patient progress forms or filing lengthy medical supply orders can be tedious and even embarrassing if sent out with mistakes. The WhiteSmoke online English grammar and writing software answers to all your needs as it corrects grammar, spelling, and punctuation mistakes. It goes even further by offering text enriching synonyms, adjectives, and adverbs – all suited to medical jargon. Completing this package are the integrated dictionary-thesaurus, 600 professional document templates, and the optional multi-language translator. All in all, WhiteSmoke is the best all-in-one writing solution to make you “Write Better – Right Now!”

Buy Now Price: $99.95

whitesmoke 2009 Hi-tech version review

The Hi-Tech Writing version of WhiteSmoke is an excellent writing solution for Hi-Tech and IT professionals. Like all versions of WhiteSmoke, you get full access to our advanced grammar checker and spell checker, as well as the style checker, which provides text enhancement suggestions to improve your writing. The dictionary-thesaurus and the spelling database of the Hi-Tech Writing version are tailored for the specific writing needs of Hi-Tech and IT professionals.

Buy Now Price: $99.95

whitesmoke 2009 Executive version review

If you are an executive manager who just doesn’t have time for editing emails and business proposals, then WhiteSmoke’s English grammar and writing software is the solution you’ve been waiting for. The Executive Version includes the text enrichment capabilities of all other WhiteSmoke versions (business, creative, legal, medical, and general), and WhiteSmoke’s world-leading grammar, spelling, and punctuation correction. These core features are backed by a one-click dictionary-thesaurus, and over 600 professional document templates. WhiteSmoke’s all-in-one solution is the best bang for your writing buck!

Buy Now Price: $249.95

Whitesmoke 2009 Business English Video Tutorials

WhiteSmoke’s Business English Video Tutorial Course is based on a comprehensive and highly interactive method to help you learn the “ins and outs” of Business English. The course is based around a series of real-life business scenarios, which help you acquire the necessary communication skills through actual business interactions. There are achievement tests to help you track your progress, and detailed case studies to help you get the most out of your Business English learning experience.

Buy Now Price: $99.95

Now buying any whitesmoke Products, get this Free!!

Whitesmoke 2009 ESL Online Video Tutorials

WhiteSmoke’s ESL Online Video Tutorial Courses are based on a comprehensive and highly interactive method to help you learn the “ins and outs” of English as a second language. The courses are based around real-life scenarios, which help you acquire the necessary communication skills through actual interactions. There are achievement tests to help you track your progress, and detailed case studies to help you get the most out of your English learning experience.

Buy Now Price: $99.95

Now buying any whitesmoke Products, get this Free!!

The Writing Process - Guide to effective writing for Technical Writers

October 18, 2008 | Leave a Comment

Introduction

One of the more difficult tasks facing IT people is finding the best way of putting across technical information in a nontechnical way.

Nontechnical writing is often the most difficult type of communication for IT people (“techos” as they are sometimes known) to do well. This is because such writing calls for communication between people with widely different backgrounds.

Nontechnical writing takes technical information and translates into ideas that can be readily understood by people who are perhaps skilled in other areas or other disciplines.

Nontechnical writing presents a situation much like that involved with translating a foreign language. When you are speaking to someone who shares a common background and language, they can fill in the gaps and make up for mistakes in your communication. However when speaking to someone who has a different background and speaks a different language, they cannot make up for gaps and mistakes, and need additional explanation.

1. The Writing Process

This is a very important section for people who have not spent half their lives learning the many techniques of writing good, easy to read prose. While there’s no real substitute for those years, by applying some basic principles the result might be quite good.

1.1. Clear & effective communication

A subject as large as this could fill a library, but as big a subject as it is, there are some general guidelines which can be applied to help you write more readable reports.

If you are serious about becoming a better writer, you’ll take the following guidelines to heart and practice them. They were mainly put forward by the English writer George Orwell in his book Politics and the English Language (1947). Taught in university courses, practised by experienced writers everywhere, they can be considered some of the “tricks of the trade”.

By implementing the techniques outlined in this document you will be able to use language as an “instrument of expressing and not for concealing or preventing thought”.

1.2. No tired figures of speech

It is a fact that when communicating, people often use expressions and clichés that have become overworked. They may once have been full of impact, able to grab a readers attention with the freshness of their imagery. But after 1,000 uses, they are past their “use by” date and deserve to be retired. Take the time to think of new ways to express familiar ideas and your writing will benefit.

1.3. Short not long words

Never use a long word when a short one will do; use “timely” not “auspicious” or “opportune, use “set” rather than “predetermined”.

Short words tend to be more specific or concrete, making the message more definite. Short words also usually have more impact.

Use a specific, concrete word instead of a general, abstract one. Instead of: “We should request management to do something about their high overheads”, say “Let’s ask John, Susan and Peter to suggest five ways of cutting departmental costs”.

Examples of general (usually long) versus specific (mostly short) include:

  • stringed instrument/guitar.
  • transport vehicle/car.
  • public service department/Queens land Transport.
  • entertainment/movie.
  • science/biology.
  • sporting event/Olympic Games.

Specific words help by allowing the other person to see a clear meaning, general or abstract words tend to obscure meaning.

1.3.1. Economical & precise with words

Economical. if it’s possible to cut a word out without losing the meaning, always cut it out. For example to write: “You can begin to down load the data to the hard disk of the computer by loading the diskette into the diskette drive and selecting “down load” from the Utilities menu which is found in the System Administration area..” Is not as economical as: “To down load the data to the PC, insert the diskette and select “down load” from the Utilities Menu”.

They both get the same meaning across but the first includes extra words which add nothing to the clarity of the statement, but which the reader is obliged to plough through nevertheless. In this example it isn’t necessary to tell the reader where the down loaded data will go or where to insert the diskette or even that the Utilities menu is in the System Administration area if this section is dealing with the System Administration area as a whole.

The rule of thumb is, don’t make people read more than they need, they get in the way, waste time and cause irritation when done to excess.

Precise With around 500,000 words (not including technical), English has perhaps the largest number of words of any language. With such a variety, try to choose the words which best express your thought. Many words have only slight differences in meaning; i.e. assisted, benefited, served, helped. Or meritorious, illustrious, distinguished, significant, renowned.

The best way to achieve precision is to:

  • Think carefully about what you’re saying, and
  • Have a broad enough vocabulary. A good way to build your vocabulary is to make a point of looking up words you don’t know and perhaps using a thesaurus when writing a document.

1.3.2. Active not passive

Always use the active voice where possible. Active voice has more impact than passive voice and is usually more concise as well. For example it’s better to write: ‘use the active voice’ than to say: ‘the use of passive voice is to be discouraged’.

Notice the diluted effect that the passive voice creates. An enormous amount of what is written in organizations suffers from this problem. Why? Partly through habit, partly through a desire to lend authority to the words and partly to hide a lack of real understanding of the subject. Half-baked or incomplete thoughts tend to be expressed this way.

1.3.3. Everyday English not foreign, jargon or scientific

Except in situations where these are specifically called for, everyday English should be used rather than foreign, jargon or scientific words (i.e. not used for the sake of appearing knowledgeable). As a general guide, choose words that are likely to be understood by the largest number of people unless you are writing for a highly specialized readership.

It is often more difficult to use a common word when the concept is normally described in technical terms. Never assume that people know the meaning of technical words unless they have specific training (i.e. a computer science graduate can be expected to know computer jargon, but the accounts clerk who is actually using the software cannot be expected to understand computer jargon.

1.3.4. Prefabricated language

Orwell also pointed to the habit many people have of using “prefabricated” language. Rather than making the effort to think of new ways of describing things, most people lazily continue to use the same old expressions they’ve been using for years. For example: ‘At this point, the weekly invoice run is initiated and without further ado will run until finished.’ Contains two pieces of prefabricated language; “at this point” and “without further ado’.

The result of overused expressions is that the message may not get through since the reader has tuned out after encountering too many overworked phrases. Original sounding language helps get the message across by sparking the reader’s interest. In the above example, you could say: ‘The weekly invoice run now commences.” Not using prefabricated language also leads to the economical expression of ideas.

1.3.5. Present tense not past/future

Unless it specifically applies, use present tense. Say “Pressing accepts the default value” rather than “Pressing will accept . .” (future tense). Another example, “use active voice in the present tense” rather than “the use of passive voice in the future tense is to be discouraged’.

Using present tense makes the message sound more immediate. The reader unconsciously thinks if it’s happening now, it’s worth knowing. If it’s happening in the future, let’s wait until it happens. If it’s already happened, it’s history.

1.3.6. Avoiding overstatement

This general guideline applies to all communication. In an attempt to strengthen their message, many people resort to overstatement - words that convey an exaggerated view of a person, event or situation. If someone says “You never help me with my work” they invite a reply like “Of course I help you, what about last week?’.

When a speaker exaggerates it usually makes the other person defensive - all of which gets in the way of clear communication. It’s better to limit yourself to simply stating the facts, it shows that you’re being fair and mindful of the other person’s feelings.

1.3.7. Adapting words to the reader

To help the other person perceive what you’re saying as interesting and intelligible. Certainly, using precise specific words adds interest as mentioned earlier, but you can also add interest by being concise and colorful in your phrasing.

Another way to add interest is to use colorful, non cliché expressions. For example, to describe an experience as being “electrifying” is colorful but commonplace, to say it was “like touching an electric fence” adds color and freshness, making it both more interesting and entertaining for the listener/reader.

1.3.8. Never barbarous (advisory only)

Note: This section is for general interest only. It is included for the sake of completeness. Despite the fact that opportunities to use “barbarous” language in reports are limited, it is still worth mentioning since it is perhaps the most corrupting use of language seen today.

Orwell makes the point because he was appalled at the way governments would use terms like “collateral damage” to describe the deaths of innocent people, or their own soldiers being killed by “friendly fire” (mistakenly killed by their own side), or “ethnic cleansing” used to describe genocide.

Notice that barbarous terms are abstract, they don’t have a down-to-earth meaning. “Collateral damage” would become horrifying if the meaning was made concrete by showing the victims as real people - perhaps one’s own husband, wife or children. “Ethnic cleansing” sounds almost harmless but its real meaning is barbaric when you imagine it happening in your street, to people you know.

Why is it done? Usually as a way of legitimizing or “selling” acts of barbarism to people who would otherwise object. As an exercise, the next time a war occurs in which Australia or it’s allies are involved, listen to the way in which the events are described in the media. The words are carefully chosen to persuade us that the war is necessary because “we” are right and “they” are wrong. People often forget that there is no absolute right or wrong when it comes to why nations go to war. It is up to governments to “sell” the idea by glorifying our own cause and demonising the enemy’s.

1.4. Non sexist language

Care should be taken to avoid sexist (or nondiscriminatory as it is legally known) language.

As a general guide:

  • Make no gender assumptions - avoid using language which assumes a person’s gender. Today, there are very few jobs where a person is always male or female. Instead of saying “he/she” or “they” when mentioning a person, refer to their job title or function, i.e. “the data entry clerk” or “the user” or simply as “you”.
  • Don’t get carried away with removing apparent gender bias in language. With the best of intentions it can mutilate language. For example a “manhole” cover is the generic name of the object and to call it a “personhole” cover obscures it’s meaning and leaves itself open to ridicule, whereas “access” cover is acceptable.
  • Further information - if in doubt, consult the Anti-Discrimination Act and the Equal Opportunity in Public Employment Act relevant to your state.

1.5. Writer’s block

Common causes of writer’s block include:

  • Internal censor - imaginary, internal critic, speaking with the voice of teachers, parents or other authority figures. The censor makes us reject what might have been written before the writing process has a chance to get under way.
  • Fear of failure - originates also from authority figures. It makes us see writing as difficult or risky. It generates anxiety and lack of self-esteem (I’m a hopeless writer!)
  • Perfectionism - having unrealistically high standards, not setting realistic goals.
  • Procrastination - you begin by sitting down to make a start. After a time you’re thinking of all the things you could be doing - some of them quite important which should probably be done right away. Next thing you know, you’re doing that something else and thinking “Well I’ll get back to that later”. This is the gentle art of procrastination whose basis lies deep in the heart of human nature.

1.5.1. Preparation

The problem is often that you’re expecting to hear the finished product being dictated in your mind by that mysterious process called inspiration. But before the words will start to flow you need to know a lot about the subject. So if you are experiencing writer’s block, it’s generally a sign that you don’t yet know enough about the subject. Spend some more time preparing and getting to know the subject well.

1.5.2. Make a start

Another tip is to lower your expectations about the quality of output at the beginning and just write what you do know even if it sounds half baked. The important thing is to start the flow of words one way or another. Concentrate on getting as much down as possible with the intention of going back and correcting it later. It doesn’t matter at this stage how bad it sounds, no one else need see it. Anything you write now can be changed later in the light of a better understanding of the subject.

1.5.3. Review the reference material

If that doesn’t help, go back and review the reference material you have prepared. A lack of reference material as discussed in the previous chapter is the source of writer’s block. It highlights the importance of thorough presentation to the success of the documentation.

1.6. Environment

Most people work best in a quiet, comfortable environment, as free as possible from interruptions and distractions. Easier said than done in many work places, particularly when the telephone never stops ringing and coworkers frequently want to chat.

It is important to arrange a time and a place during the working day where you can work in a quiet, interruption free environment, since you need to be able to concentrate and follow a train of thought for an extended period.

1.7. Routine

Get into the habit of writing everyday. It helps to reinforce the writing process and to overcome writer’s block.

The process of writing involves using the part of your mind that performs the enormously complex task of turning ideas into language. Unless you use this acquired skill regularly, it falls into disuse. It gets rusty and won’t work properly. It’s similar in some ways to physical fitness. Just as regular exercise keeps a person fit, writing something every day helps to keep your writing faculties in good working condition. Schedule a period each day to work on the documentation and do everything you can to stick to the schedule. If your other commitments make it difficult to allocate time on a regular basis, discuss the matter with your manager with a view to reorganizing your work load.

1.8. Ergonomics

Since writing involves sitting in one position for long periods, certain ergonomic factors need to be considered. These include the following:

1.8.1. Chair

Provide yourself with a chair that gives good lumbar (lower back) support. Try to avoid slouching in the chair for long periods as this places strain on the lumber vertebrae.

1.8.2. Screen

The screen should be on or around eye level and not closer than around 40 centimeters. Screens (liquid crystal flat screen types excepted) do emit a small amount of radiation. While no definite proof exists that this radiation is harmful to humans, many people do report degrees of discomfort and eyestrain. Common sense would suggest trying to minimize your exposure. Using an earthed radiation shield is recommended. The intensity of radiation coming from a screen decreases rapidly the further away the screen is. Therefore, position the screen to be as close as it needs to be to allow your eyes to comfortably read the words on the screen, and no closer.

Adjust the brightness to be just bright enough rather than brighter than necessary. If the brightness needs to be high to overcome reflected light from windows, either rearrange the screen away from the direct light, or arrange blinds. All of this helps to minimize eyestrain.

1.8.3. Regular breaks

Occupational health guidelines recommend taking a break every hour by getting up and walking around. This not only helps your circulation and eyes, it also clears the mind.

1.8.4. Keyboard

Your wrists should not need to be bent while using the keyboard. Studies show that Repetitive Strain Injury (RSI) can occur where a keyboard operator, over a long period, constantly types with bent wrists. The strain is due to the tendons which pass through the wrist from the lower arm to the hands becoming inflamed because they are being stretched and constricted as they pass through the narrow aperture in the wrist known as the Carpal Tunnel.

Avoid this possibility by making sure the keyboard is not too high. Either adjust the seat higher up, or arrange for a lower desk or a keyboard drawer which fits under the desk top, or a wrist support pad.

White Smoke 2009 - Computer Make Your Text Grammatically Terrific

October 15, 2008 | Leave a Comment

After several years of research and development on the promising idea of an intelligent writing tool for correcting and enhancing a user’s text, White Smoke 2009 says thet can deliver it. Featuring a grammar checking engine that detects a wider range of errors than any other commercial grammar checker, and a range of other tools to create an all-in-one writing solution, White Smoke 2009 says it is the ideal software application for writers, copy editors and at-home Internet users who are concerned with creating error-free texts.

Community is the Key

“The real secret behind White Smoke’s technologies is our user base. Our users give us constant feedback, and a very wide variety of texts for analysis - without this interaction, our algorithms would not be so advanced,” states Liran Brenner, VP R&D at White Smoke. “Our users make a passionate community, and have stuck with the product throughout its development due to the great potential it brings to written communications. White Smoke’s writing technologies level the playing field, allowing English as a Second Language speakers, and those of us who simply need a good editor for our writing, to confidently write error-free texts.”

White Smoke writing technologies are based on natural language processing (NLP) technology. The program works by analyzing an entire sentence, understanding the structure, and making corrections and suggestions based on a combination of grammar rules and complex statistical models. This approach is unique, and was a factor in leading Business 2.0 to include White Smoke as one of its “31 Best Business Ideas in the World” of 2006. The latest release, White Smoke 2009, is the complete fruition of the White Smoke idea - an intelligent and dynamic tool for writers; a tool that works alongside any text-based application.

Hilla Ovil-Brenner, White Smoke CEO, says, “I am proud to say that White Smoke 2009 is a very mature product for professional writers, and for people who just want to write correct English in their emails and instant messages. Now that we have launched White Smoke 2009 with its advanced grammar checking and style checking features, we hope to reach out to a wider audience, especially writing and copy editing professionals, and writers of English as a Second Language. The new Hi-Tech Writing profile is also aimed at high tech and IT professionals, another niche that needs professional text editing and enhancement. We at White Smoke truly hope to revolutionize written online communications by bringing quality English to everyone.”

White Smoke is a company in the field of English writing technologies with a focus on products that enhance and correct grammar, spelling, and writing style. White Smoke products are based on natural language processing (NLP) technology, featuring unique and patented artificial intelligence algorithms for text analysis. As well as the White Smoke 2009 desktop software, White Smoke makes its technologies available through other channels, such as a browser-based text editor, and specialized OEM versions designed for integration with 3rd party service providers.

See the White Smoke website for further information

English Tips for ESL Learners

October 12, 2008 | Leave a Comment

English can be a challenging second language.  It’s a big language with a daunting amount of vocabulary.  Much of that vocabulary is confusing or contradictory, with homonyms that sound the same but are spelled differently, and inconsistent spelling rules.  Regular verbs in English are fairly simple to conjugate, but there are many, many irregular verbs.  When the rules and exceptions have been mastered, you still must learn English idioms, phrases which mean more than the literal translation of their words.

English Vocabulary

English is a living and evolving language with a rich, diverse history.  Much of English has its roots in Latin, and this gives the language a certain order and predictability.  English, however, has borrowed from dozens of languages over the years.  This wealth of diversity makes the study of English an endlessly fascinating challenge.

Homonyms

One of the toughest challenges in building an English vocabulary is differentiating between homonyms, words which sound the same but have a different meaning.  Sometimes the spelling is the same.  A “vault” is a safe or strongbox.  “To vault” is to jump over something.

Often homonyms are spelled differently.  Here is a list of a few common homonyms.  There are many more.

It’s - It is.
Its - Belonging to it.  This is an exception to the usual rule about using an apostrophe to indicate possession.

Led - Past tense of the verb “to lead.”
Lead (pronounced “led”) - a soft, heavy grey metal.

Break - To badly damage something; a gap or interruption.
Brake - To stop.

Higher - With more height.
Hire - To employ.

Peace - The opposite of war or strife.
Piece - Part of something.

Spelling Rules

English spelling can be distressingly inconsistent.  “Stuff,” “tough,” and “Ralph” all end with the same sound.  “Ambitious,” “vicious,” and “shoes” just about rhyme, while “tough” and “plough” sound very different.  To make matters worse, spellings vary in different parts of the world.  “Plough” is the British spelling for a farming implement that would be called a “plow” in the United States.

Here is an example of a mnemonic device for remembering spelling.

I before E, except after C,
or when sounded like “ay,” as in “neighbor” and “weigh.”

This covers many situations.

I before E - this covers words like “relief” and “grieve”

except after C - this covers words like “conceive” and “receipt”

or when sounded like “ay,” as in “neighbor” and “weigh” - this covers words like “freight”

However, there are still exceptions.  The past tense or plural form of words ending in “cy” will be “cied” or “cies.”  Examples include “fancied” and “emergencies.”  There are many other exceptions, including “conscience,” “ancient,” “glacier,” and “society.”

Plurals

The rules in English for creating the plural form of nouns are fairly simple.  Add an “s” to the end of the word.  If the word ends in “y,” change the “y” to “ies.”  If the word ends in “f,” change the “f” to “ves.”  There are, however, many exceptions.  Here are a few examples.

Singular    Plural
mouse    mice
moose    moose
goose        geese
cow        cows or cattle
child        children

Verbs

The English language has many irregular verbs.  The most significant example is the verb “to be.”

I am hungry.
You are hungry.
He is hungry.
I will be hungry.
Yesterday I was hungry.

Many verbs have an irregular form in the past tense.  Here are some common examples.

Present    Past
catch         caught
come        came
do        did
fly        flew
freeze        froze
get         got
hide         hid
send        sent
sleep        slept
take        took
tell        told

Idioms

An idiom is a common figurative expression.  An idiom will usually be recognized immediately by a native English speaker, but the meaning may not be clear to someone from another culture.  Here are some examples of common English idioms.

A bit much - excessive; too much

A little bird told me - someone told me, and I don’t want to say who

A penny for your thoughts - what are you thinking about?

About-face - a complete change of direction or opinion

Made of money - has plenty of money

Make a mountain out of a molehill - make a small problem seem much bigger
Much ado about nothing - a lot of fuss about something insignificant

Packed like sardines - extremely crowded

Pain in the neck - something annoying

Paint the town red - go out partying and drinking

Put your foot in your mouth - say something inappropriate or embarrassing

Tall order - something difficult to achieve

Tall tale - a story that is exaggerated and untrue

Think outside the box - think creatively, without limitations

Tongue in cheek - something spoken “with tongue in cheek” is not meant to be taken seriously

Baby boomer - an American or Canadian born just after World War II

Egg on your face - you look foolish or embarrassed

Elbow grease - hard physical work

Master of Fine Arts in Creative Writing

October 12, 2008 | Leave a Comment

In 1996, the popular news magazine U.S. News and World Report conducted a nationwide survey of professors from nearly a hundred Master of Fine Arts in Creative Writing (M.F.A.) programs.  The result of this survey was the publication, in 1997, of the first-ever program rankings in the field.  Each program was given a numeric score based upon a single factor: the reputation of the program, as assessed by current faculty at various M.F.A. programs nationwide.  At the time, the top five programs were listed as (in order), University of Iowa, The Johns Hopkins University, University of Houston, Columbia University, and University of Virginia.
In the four years following the first publication of these rankings, the survey results were republished several times by U.S. News and World Report, each time without alteration or update.  Eventually, in 2001, the magazine publicly announced that it would, in fact, cease ranking M.F.A. in Creative Writing programs, and had no present or future plans, therefore, to amend or augment the data it collected in 1996.  The rumored reason for this editorial decision was that the magazine felt its statistical paradigm and assessment tools were ill-suited to assessing studio-art graduate programs (though, interestingly, the magazine continued publishing annual rankings in the fields of Ceramics, Graphic Design, Industrial Design, Multimedia/Visual Communications, Painting/Drawing, Photography, Printmaking, and Sculpture).
In 2005, a fiction-writer and Lecturer at Stanford University, Tom Kealey, wrote and published the first comprehensive guide to M.F.A. in Creative Writing programs, The Creative Writing MFA Handbook (Continuum Publishing, 2005).  While the book did not formally rank programs, it was notable for both the depth of its treatment of its subject as well as its introduction of a then-novel concept: that the quality of the financial aid package offered by an M.F.A. program should be as important a consideration in the matriculation decision of an applicant as a program’s reputation and location.  The theory behind this maxim, according to Kealey, was that as the M.F.A. degree was a “studio” degree, rather than a professional degree–inasmuch as the degree alone did not guarantee employment in any specific field–applicants should avoid, where possible, programs which did not fully or at least generously fund all their students.
The result of Kealey’s funding-centered analysis of M.F.A. programs was a fundamental reordering of the program rankings previously published by U.S. News & World Report.  Whereas these latter rankings had not included funding as a factor, the implicit rankings of The Creative Writing MFA Handbook–which discussed the comparative quality of various programs without formally ranking them–significantly privileged fully-funded programs.  Consequently, the top programs, in Kealey’s assessment, appeared to be (in order), University of California at Irvine, University of Texas, University of Michigan, Cornell University, Indiana University, University of Virginia, Syracuse University, The Johns Hopkins University, Brown University, and University of Houston.  Notably absent from Kealey’s top-ten rankings were the popular New York City-based programs at Columbia University and New York University, both of which had been ranked in the top ten in the U.S. News and World Report rankings, but were now felt to offer sub-standard financial aid packages.  Kealey’s implicit overhaul of the earlier U.S. News and World Report rankings presaged a new era in the ranking of M.F.A. programs, in which much of the old conventional wisdom–for instance, that apart from the much-vaunted program at the University of Iowa, programs on the East and West coasts were categorically most desireable–would be discarded.
In December of 2006, I published on my website, The Suburban Ecstasies, my interpretation of the largely-implied M.F.A. program rankings contained in The Creative Writing MFA Handbook, calling the resulting rankings The Kealey Scale.  Realizing that The Kealey Scale was, by dint of its origin, heavily weighted toward consideration of funding, I augmented The Kealey Scale with an informal poll of M.F.A. applicants conducted primarily on the website of the literary magazine Poets & Writers.  While in no way sponsored or endorsed by Poets & Writers, the resulting Poets & Writers Reader Poll was nevertheless significant in that it was the first-ever assessment of which programs the most well-informed M.F.A. applicants favored.  The results were striking, largely in their substantial deviation from the rankings published by U.S. News and World Report in 1997.  The top-polling programs, amongst a group of 200 respondents, were (in order) University of Iowa, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, University of Michigan, University of Virginia, University of Texas, Cornell University, Indiana University, Syracuse University, Brown University, and University of California at Irvine.  This new data had the effect of confirming the significance and accuracy of Kealey’s earlier-published rankings, as the correlation between Kealey’s research and the opinions of the largest gathering of M.F.A. applicants on the internet was striking.
The response to the publication of The Kealey Scale and the Poets & Writers Reader Poll was overwhelming; within days of their publication, The Suburban Ecstasies began receiving more than 1,000 unique visitors/day, suggesting that the rapidly-expanding field of graduate study in creative writing was desperate for new assessment tools.  In light of the popularity of the two new rankings of M.F.A. in Creative Writing programs on The Suburban Ecstasies, I began collecting additional data on M.F.A. programs heretofore unavailable either on the internet or in print.  Specifically, I researched the yield-exclusive acceptance rates for more than fifty programs, including most of the top fifty programs as ranked by Kealey and the readers of Poets & Writers.  The most significant discovery of this process was that the top creative writing programs were more difficult to get into than the top medical, law, engineering, and business schools in the United States.  Specifically, all of the top-ten toughest-admit M.F.A. programs in the field had yield-exclusive acceptance rates below 3%, headed up by three schools–Cornell University, University of Texas, and University of Wisconsin–each with acceptance rates of 1.5%.  While research into M.F.A. admissions data also uncovered the low number of applications per program, with only University of Iowa receiving more than 1,000 applications total, it also revealed a distinct upward trend in the number of applicants per program, and even the number of programs in the United States overall.  In the ten years since U.S. News and World Report had last published M.F.A. in Creative Writing rankings, an average of six new programs had been founded per year.
In late 2007, I augmented The Kealey Scale, the Poets & Writers Reader Poll, and the data on M.F.A. acceptance rates with a fresh Poets & Writers Reader Poll as well as the first-ever genre-specific polls (including rankings in the genres of poetry and fiction, and a ranking of the nation’s few PhD. in Creative Writing programs).  Interestingly, the 2008 Poets & Writers Reader Poll was so similar to its 2007 predecessor as to suggest a high confidence level, statistically speaking, for the admittedly unscientific results of both polls.  In 2008, the top-ranked M.F.A. in Creative Writing programs were University of Iowa, University of Michigan, University of Texas, University of Virginia, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Brown University, Cornell University, Indiana University, Syracuse University, and University of Wisconsin.  In poetry, the top five programs were University of Michigan, University of Iowa, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, University of Virginia, and Brown University; in fiction, University of Iowa, University of Michigan, Syracuse University, University of Texas, and University of Virginia; among U.S. Creative Writing PhD. programs (of which only thirty-five presently exist), Florida State University, University of Utah, University of Houston, University of Georgia, and University of Southern California.
In mid-2008, I was asked to contribute a lengthy chapter to the second edition of The Creative Writing MFA Handbook. I determined that, if Kealey’s vision of promoting funding-weighted admissions decisions was to be realized, a funding-only ranking of M.F.A. programs was needed.  This first-ever funding ranking (denominated the Abramson/Kealey Funding Ranking) is now due to appear in the second edition of the Handbook (scheduled for release in late 2008).  By way of previewing this ranking, it can now be said that the top five best-funded M.F.A. in Creative Writing programs are University of Texas, University of Michigan, Cornell University, and (in a three-way tie for fifth) University of Florida, Indiana University, and Purdue University.
The second edition of The Creative Writing MFA Handbook also contains the first-ever Comprehensive Tiered Ranking of M.F.A. in Creative Writing programs, as well as the “master” Poets & Writers Reader Poll, with nearly 300 respondents across the application cycles of 2006-7 and 2007-8.  The top five M.F.A. programs in the field of creative writing, according to this master poll, are University of Iowa, University of Michigan, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, and (in a tie for fifth) University of Texas and University of Virginia.  The tiered ranking of programs–which includes, in total, more than sixty programs (four “top” tiers of twelve schools each, an “On the Bubble” classification containing six schools, and a “New and Climbing” category with eight programs represented)–can be found exclusively in the second edition of The Creative Writing MFA Handbook. This ranking is not available either in whole or in part on-line.
Data collection for the 2009 Poets & Writers Reader Poll is now under way, with the preliminary results–the poll is updated weekly once it is made available to the public–due to be released in early fall.

Article Writing: How To Get Published

October 12, 2008 | Leave a Comment

Many good writers are unable to get published because they do not know how to go about in this business of getting published. Their articles are interesting, the subjects are relevant, and any publication would be proud to print this kind of material, but still they remain unpublished. The problem is that they did not market their product properly.

A few centuries ago when the number of periodicals was small it was easy to find one that fulfilled one’s requirements, but with the thousands of publications around, it is difficult today for the beginner to get to the appropriate publication. Further, many are so ignorant about market realities that they want their articles and other writings to be published in the commonly available commercial publications immediately. They do not realize that these are professionally produced publications, and a writer can get published in them only after gaining considerable experience and expertise in specific fields. A beginner should not overestimate his size, but should rather find a publication that is more suitable for his standard and send for publication there.

There are at least five things that you should know about getting your writings published:

1-Choose the right publication
2-Send the carefully prepared manuscript with a covering letter
3-Do send query letters
4-Expect rejection
5-Advance as you gain experience

Of these, I will  explain two of the above  in greater detail:

1. Choose The Right Publication: Most countries today have a wide range of publications. Our country has several thousand English periodicals plus a higher number of periodicals in other languages. The total number exceeds 40,000 ! These contain an unbelievable range of publications right from the most primitive to the most advanced.

In this crowd you will find from general to highly subject-oriented publications. One publishes on a wide variety of subjects while the other publishes only on the different aspects of one subject. You will find that they have a diversity of levels. Some publish almost any articles written by the beginner while the other publishes even the articles of the expert with great caution. Some will accept articles submitted by outside writers, but others publish only articles written by their editorial staff, while still others publish only invited articles.

What is important to understand is that in this crowd somewhere there is a publication that suits your level. In fact there is a possibility that there are dozens of publications that publish submissions from the beginner. It is your responsibility to search the market thoroughly to discover several magazines that accept submissions from the beginner. Make a list of these publications. You will be deleting as well adding to this list throughout your writing career.

The easiest place to get published is the Letters To The Editor column. Unfortunately many writers do not recognize the power and the impact of this column. They feel that after all a letter is only a letter. While a letter is surely a letter, this need not always be so. Letters published in these columns can become a powerful medium for speaking to the people of your society. Researches and surveys have found that Letters To The Editor column is one of the most read columns in periodicals. Somehow people have a strong attraction to what others like them have to say on different issues. Therefore what gets published in this column is sure to be read by a lot of people. Think of the impact that you can create by publishing letters regularly in this column. What’s more, most editors will publish letters on any subject without editing or altering them even if the letter is critical of the publication and its stand.

Many publications publish submissions only if they agree with the policy of the periodical, but this does not usually apply to the Letters column. This gives a lot of liberty to the writer of the letter. This means that even if the subjects of your interest are such that they do not find a regular place in any publication, you can still place them in front of thousands of readers through the Letters column.

For example, suppose you read horrifying reports of ragging in professional colleges and feel disgusted at how tens of thousands of innocent young people are subjected to humiliation and torture every year, you can start a national campaign through the Letters column of newspapers. You can stir thousands of people, bringing this primitive, brutal, and beastly practice to and end.

As a beginner you should try to use the Letters column of the local newspaper and other available publications both for gaining writing experience as well as to get your name established among the readership.

2. Send The Carefully Prepared Manuscript Along With A Covering Letter: Except for the Letters to the Editor column, you should send all your manuscripts to the editor with a good covering letter. It is not sufficient to send the article alone because it does not bring you in proper contact and rapport with the editor. You must realize all editors are human beings and only a personal touch will gain proper attention from them. This is becoming more and more true in this generation where the number of writings that call for the attention of the editors is increasing at an explosive rate.

The covering letter must be a brief and polite one that calls the attention of the editor to your writing. If this is your first ever submission to him, then introduce yourself briefly in this letter. Give some information about your background and also any publications that you already have. Also, if you have been reading his publication for some time, include some helpful and honest comments and observations about that publication. A typical letter might look something like the following:

Date:
The Editor
Daily Trumpet
Street Of The Infamous,
BookCity-120099

Dear Sir,

It is my privilege to send an article titled “Thirty Ways To Get Published” for consideration for publication in your periodical. This is my first ever submission to your publication.

I have been fond of guiding my friends to write, and I have published a lot of guidelines on this subject in my college and school magazines.

I have been reading the Daily Trumpet now for almost six months. Your editorials are very timely, to the point, and enlightening for the new as well as the old readers. Please continue to give us this good material.

I am enclosing a Stamped Self Addressed Envelope, for returning the article in case you find it is not useful for you.

Yours sincerely,

I. M. Helper

I have not shown the date and return address on the sample letter above, but you must include them too. Including the Stamped Self Addressed Envelope or SASE is necessary because most publications do not return the rejected manuscript unless you enclose SASE with each submission.

NEVER send the same manuscript at the same time to more than one publisher. If more than one editor decides to accept it, you will be faced with several unpleasant possibilities. The first is to inform one publisher that you are withdrawing this writing from his publication even though he wants to publish it. He might accept your request for withdrawal, but never expect him to show interest in your writings in future. After all, who would want to waste time on something about which he is not sure whether he will get it or not.

Modern-day Editors Have A Very Demanding Live, And Writers Who Make It Tough For Them Will Automatically Get Rejected  !!

The second possibility is even more damaging. If two or more publications accept the writing and publish it without first informing you (and this happens many a times), you will run into a messy copyright problem. What’s worse, you loose your credibility with all those publications. Never play with these things. You have to remain in the field of writing for a long period.

If you were commissioned to write on a topic, then always include a copy of that letter with your manuscript and covering letter. Busy editors can always forget that they had commissioned someone to write, and it is not always easy for them to locate the copy of the letter that they wrote to you. Further, in a large publication your submission need not always go to the person who originally commissioned you to write it. A copy of the original letter will, however, place your writing in its proper perspective.

White Smoke Review

October 8, 2008 | Leave a Comment

The White Smoke software is available as a download and works with any program. You can paste text in and copy it out, or simply compose in the compose window. I tried the online demo, and there are some minor differences from the downloadable product. However, most of the main features are the same.

So, what does it look like? It’s a bit like Word, Google Docs and other word processing programs. It’s got a simple array of formatting buttons across the top for editing style, font and font size, followed by buttons for bold, italics, underline, creating coloured text and a few more. The second row has buttons for alignment, bullets and numbering, and cutting and pasting. A cool feature is that it will paste text from Word or plain text depending on the button you choose.

The top of the window has three tabs on the left (enrichment, dictionary and templates) plus two on the right for information. The templates window allows you to load one of 600 templates in the commercial, literary, medical or legal categories and customise them for your needs. The dictionary is a lookup window and the main window, where you write and edit text, is enrichment. At the bottom of a window is a WhiteSmoke button, as well as undo, redo and demo buttons. The bottom right allows you to select the type of writing you are doing (great for those interested in business and literary, less so for those of us who blog for a living) If you’re writing a speech, dissertation or letter, you’re covered too. On to the main window.

Grammar Checking

You can use WhiteSmoke with any application, since it works with cut and paste, and you can also set it to check as you type. When you paste some text in, and hit one of those two buttons you get some text underlined in different colours. The colour code is blue for enrichment/thesaurus, green for grammar and red for spelling, cleverly following MS Word conventions. Here is where it gets interesting. Click on or hover over an underlined word and you get suggestions for improvement. So, how did WhiteSmoke do? I used it to check three articles I was writing for a client.

It picked up well on spelling errors. I use UK English, so it tried to convert them to US English. It found no grammatical errors - I had to insert a deliberate mistake to test that. That’s a major improvement over Word, which always finds grammatical errors where there are none. For me, the winner was the enrichments popup menu. That’s in two parts. The left suggests adjectives and adverbs you can add to enrich your writing, while the right suggests synonyms. Just click to add your changes. I liked some of the suggestions and can see where this type of software would help people who struggle with writing.

There are several different WhiteSmoke products aimed respectively at general writing, business writing, creative writing, legal writing, medical writing and executive writing, as well as a language translator that offers instant translation into 20 languages. There are also pro versions with additional enhancements (currently on sale for $1 when you buy the main program).

White Smoke is a useful product, especially for people who are new to writing or who have English as a second language. Even experienced writers will find it useful on a day when the words just aren’t flowing the way you want.

White Smoke Writing Proofreading Software - Editing & Fixing Your Grammar

October 3, 2008 | Leave a Comment

White Smoke Writing Proofreading Software is an important tool for both English native speakers and ESL students alike. We can spend hours on writing, rewriting, checking and proofreading our different writing tasks trying to maintain it correct and professional. Looking for new ways that will help you to enrich and correct your English writing without any extra effort? Read this article.

Some background

White Smoke Writing Proofreading Software provides advanced grammar and proofreading capabilities that aren’t available with our conventional word processors. The way they ‘fix’ your writing is interesting yet complicated; basically these solutions compare your sentences to their own ‘proper versions’ of similar sentences. These sophisticated software solutions usually provide the following: proofreading for correct grammar, correcting spelling mistakes, and checking on proper punctuation.

Important advantages

Let’s summarize the main benefits and advantages:

- Helping us to avoid embarrassing grammar mistakes.

- Providing extra capabilities which do not exist in conventional word processors.

- Enriching our English vocabulary.

Looking closer on this technology, we could easily find other advantages that were not mentioned in this review, as this technology is constantly moving forward, bringing us fresh improvements that help us on improving our Writing performance.

Conclusion

White Smoke Writing Proofreading Software and other NLP technologies (Natural Language Processing) will undoubtedly gain more and more popularity as we all understand the importance of maintaining a high-quality writing level. It is important to keep in mind that this technology is not 100% perfect; however, it provides help for our most common writing problems. Developing this complex technology is challenging, however, we can expect this solution to further develop itself, simply because writing is one of the most important tools that helps us communicating with others.

White Smoke Writing Proofreading Software provides advanced grammar and proofreading capabilities that aren’t available with our conventional word processors. Smart proofreading and grammar correction solutions rely on sophisticated engines and dynamic databases. They process your writing, compare it, and finally fix it. If we research these nlp (natural language processing) programs we will notice that most of them provide the following: instant correction for basic grammar mistakes, spelling and typos, and punctuation errors.

What are the main benefits?

Let’s quickly see what is in it for us:

* Improving our writing style.
* Improving and enriching our speech, enabling us to speak correct and better English.
* Enriching our English vocabulary.

If we examine it closer we would probably find additional benefits that aren’t mentioned here, as this innovative technology keeps improving, bringing us fresh solutions that help us on improving our English writing.

Summary

White Smoke Writing Proofreading Software can help us correct and polish most of our daily writing assignments - Emails, documents, job applications, and more. Everyone agrees that it cannot completely eliminate our writing problems; however, it can significantly help us on improving our writing skills. Although it is already available, we can expect this tool to further develop itself, simply because writing is one of the most important tools that help us fulfill our daily assignments.

A Guide to Business English Writing

October 1, 2008 | Leave a Comment


Successful business writing means taking some extra care with grammar and spelling, clearly stating your main point, writing clearly, and giving some thought to your audience.

The Impact of Business Writing

Readers will judge you to some extent based on your writing. Take extra care with grammar and spelling. Sending a message with grammar errors is like showing up for a meeting with your shirt untucked. It gives an impression of sloppiness.

Business English should be reasonably formal. Do not, however, let your writing become stilted. Keep a somewhat conversational tone, without being unprofessional. Be careful with humor, which is easier to miss or misunderstand in writing without the benefit of body language.

Don’t use “smilies” :) or the casual abbreviations that have become popular in e-mails, like LOL or TTFN.

Be particularly careful with the names of companies and people. You don’t want subordinates, colleagues, or clients to get the impression that you don’t care about them.

Bad writing will do more than give a bad impression. A poorly-written document will fail to achieve whatever objective you had when you wrote it. If you write a long, rambling document with dense blocks of text, many readers will skim it briefly and discard it. If people don’t read your letters and e-mails, then writing them is a waste of your time.

Write Clearly

To write clearly, keep the following points in mind:

  • Use simple, clear words
  • Get to the point
  • Format the document appropriately

Us